When D* was born, H* worked, and I took care of baby. I hired a student to help, and she came by for two half days a week. H*’s parents watched D* occasionally as well. I worked during the two half days, in the evenings when I could, and when D* was supposed to be sleeping; though I would often find D* had stayed up waiting for me…more here.
www.ITIOaChild.com Discussion 
Let’s try some more truth:
I’ve read over all the records leading up to the divorce, and have met H’s friends in town who lent her money after you cleared out her bank account, leaving her penniless during the divorce. I know she borrowed money from her brother and a sister also. Let’s look at your own statements below from your book about the amounts you were spending in secret, hiring lawyers to prepare for the divorce in December,2000:
“Given at that had happened, how hard could it be to divorce her? Still I wanted to make
sure it was done cleanly. I got into the car drove downtown to meet an attorney of great
experience and skill, Jim Piper.”
“I requested my retainer to be returned from the office, and got a small
part of it. Jim kept thousands of dollars for an initial consultation and an initial conference
discussion.”
“My second attorney choice was Ted. Mom put in fourteen
thousand dollars, and I put in twenty-one, to make up Ted’s required amount of $35,000.
Mom was very concerned for D* after what she had seen.”
So we see above that you snuck around spending tens of thousands of dollars, and your mom was also “invested in the process”.
Let’s also discuss how you declared bankruptcy after the divorce, but held onto all your patents by declaring them 0 value, then sold several patents for a sum that would be nearly 400 thousand dollars. Seems you have defrauded your creditors.
By: jay on 2010 01 09
at 6:57 pm
Jay, Jay, Jay, you need to wake up. Fraud is this lady’s specialty. If you haven’t figured that out by now you better go shore up your accounts. H always controlled the money. Let me correct a couple things here:
Firstly, It was H who started the process before I searched for any attorneys. She had requested and wanted me to initiate on paper. I now believe this was because she wanted to make sure her citizenship papers would not be questioned. We now know she had good reason to be concerned about this. .
Secondly, H had plenty of money , she even wire transferred money to at least some of the very same people she claimed to have borrowed from before she borrowed the money. She did not declare the money she did have at the divorce, and she claimed a lot of debt that she did not have. She had worked out that I had signed a deed of trust to owe on the house, but not a deed of warranty – which means I owed on it but did not own it. As a direct result of her fraud I came out of the divorce with all of he debt and none of the property, with only the exception of some books, some hand tools, and a power saw – most of which I owned coming into the marriage, including the saw. There were items that I brought into the marriage that she kept. She even fought not to return the books and the saw while saying she could sell them at a garage sale *to make money*.
And yes, as you point out above, I borrowed money to fund the divorce. Do you not see the contradiction? If I had ‘taken all the money’ as you say, why would I have had to borrow money to fund the divorce?
About my IP business, you are way off about this also. H stole all my business files . Her attorney even called a major client and made false professional accusations against me – but the most damaging part was that proved H controlled my professional files. People in the IP business were not happy to say the least. My IP business was completely dead as a result. It did not end there, they used the subpoena as a weapon to harass the partnership I joined after this and I had to leave. It took three years to develop another client after this and it was a lot of work. Things are far from where they would be if she hadn’t done this. The damages are immense. Now this most recent accusation fraud “set up a fund for me” , has run off clients here.
This comment of yours bothers me a great deal. Firstly I have to question why you would bring this up at all. Are you saying because mom loaned me money for the divorce in 2001 that is the reason she is not allowed to contact her grandson, D? Is this what you have been attacking D’s relationship with is father and father’s family over all of these years? To get even with me over a money issue you perceive? Jay, this is more sick stuff.
By: itioachild on 2010 01 10
at 11:01 am