In the prior post we limited comments to the topic of money and when D would be allowed to contact his father’s family. We heard something about the money. Thus far there has been no reply to the question of when D will be allowed to talk with his family.
Really the bottom line here is that H is blocking D’s access to his father which is part of a long history of blocked access , and at times she has been right down vicious about it. As we have H’s defender, Count Olaf, ‘on the line’ (judging from the logs, apparently with dozens of accesses to the site today) – lets ask him to speak right to the heart of the matter by answering this question:
“What have you or H ever done to facilitate D’s relationship with his father?” You all have been the ‘primary conservator’ so this is your responsibility. Please be specific in your answer.
www.ITIOaChild.com Discussion 
Let’s try some more truth:
In Tom’s book, as well as in several court documents, Tom accuses H of going to England with me and dumping D on him for a week.
In fact, H did leave D with Tom in 2005 for a week to go on a business trip to England. H had volunteers to watch D, including myself, but chose to let Tom watch him because he had been asking for more time. H has several times correct Tom on his false story, but he simply keeps reinventing it, changing it to more and more demonize H. Here is one version from Tom below, in which not only did she go with me to england (I never went with her), but didn’t tell Tom she would be gone for a week … all lies, and they all fall apart under any scrutiny.
“In 2005, when H wanted to go on a trip with her boyfriend and could not find last
minute child watching accommodations, she asked me to watch D “for the weekend.” The following Monday she was not at the school for pickup—nor Tuesday, nor Wednesday. It turned out that H knew when she asked about the weekend that she would be gone for a week, as she had flown to England. My hopes that the new boyfriend would break her obsession for revenge was … “
By: jay on 2010 01 11
at 1:00 am
I gather you are trying to say that in the eight years since the divorce the only thing you can think of that you all have done in support of D’s relationship with his father was letting D stay with his father for one week in March of 2005 while H was out of town – and you heavily regret it.
It was good to let D spend the week with his dad, though you failed to mention that
H took the time back from D the next summer.
The generic ‘you lie!’ or ‘the story changes!’ do not answer the question of what *you all* have done over the past 8 years to support D’s relationship with his father. These are your words not mine.
For an eight year period, is this it?
D’s plight will not be forgotten. His voice will not be buried. http://www.ITIOaChild.com
By: itioachild on 2010 01 11
at 11:32 pm